Difference between revisions of "Containers"
From Ancient Anguish Mud Wiki - AAwiki
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|a fine fur sack(ranger)|| 11 ||55%||1 | |a fine fur sack(ranger)|| 11 ||55%||1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |a wanderer's pack|| 13 ||38%||1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|a canvas pack||16||38%/31%||1 | |a canvas pack||16||38%/31%||1 |
Revision as of 13:16, 8 May 2014
Containers are important for any character. They make it so you can carry much more than you normally would be able to without them. For best results, use worn containers.
Weight reduction = % by which the container reduces when full. i.e. hobbit-made backpack makes 6 bottles weigh 4, so thats a 33% reduction
Some containers have better bonuses when worn, so its organized under weight reduction like so: worn/not worn. If only one value shown then there is no difference.
Worn Listings
Name | Capacity | Weight Reduction | Empty Weight |
---|---|---|---|
a hobbit-made backpack | 6 | 33% | 2 |
a bag | 6 | 33% | 1 |
a fine fur pouch(ranger) | 6 | 66%/50% | 1 |
a fine fur pack(ranger) | 9 | 33% | 1 |
a large leather sack | 10 | 40% | 1 |
a leather backpack | 10 | 50% | 1 |
a fine fur sack(ranger) | 11 | 55% | 1 |
a wanderer's pack | 13 | 38% | 1 |
a canvas pack | 16 | 38%/31% | 1 |
a fashionable knights pack | 16 | 50% | 1 |
a soft sack | 18 | 44%/28% | 1 |
a provision sack | 20 | 35% | 1 |
a large silk pack | 20 | 33%/30% | 1 |
an equipment rucksack | 20 | 33%/30% | 1 |
a rugged knapsack | 22 | 64%/32% | 1 |
the belt of the giant | 30 | 66% | 2 |
Not Worn Listings
Name | Capacity | Weight Reduction | Empty Weight |
---|---|---|---|
a footlocker | 15 | 33% | 2 |
a chest* | 40 | 35% | 5 |
Chest from fubs and chest from brigand seem the same
Credit
Information taken from notes gathered by GhanimX, notes found on proboards, and some stuff from cosms site.