Difference between revisions of "Containers"
From Ancient Anguish Mud Wiki - AAwiki
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=Worn Listings= | =Worn Listings= | ||
{| class=wikitable | {| class=wikitable | ||
− | !Name !! Capacity !! Weight Reduction !! Empty Weight | + | !Name !! From !! Capacity !! Weight Reduction !! Empty Weight |
|- | |- | ||
− | |a hobbit-made backpack|| 6 ||33%||2 | + | |a hobbit-made backpack|| Hobbitat|| 6 ||33%||2 |
|- | |- | ||
|a bag || 6 ||33%||1 | |a bag || 6 ||33%||1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | a fine fur pouch(ranger) ||6 || 66%/50% || 1 | + | | a fine fur pouch(ranger) || Rangers ||6 || 66%/50% || 1 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |a fine fur pack(ranger) || 9 || 33% || 1 | + | |a fine fur pack(ranger) || Rangers || 9 || 33% || 1 |
|- | |- | ||
|a large leather sack||10||40%||1 | |a large leather sack||10||40%||1 | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|a leather backpack || 10||50%||1 | |a leather backpack || 10||50%||1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |a fine fur sack(ranger)|| 11 ||55%||1 | + | |a fine fur sack(ranger)||Rangers || 11 ||55%||1 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |a wanderer's pack|| 13 ||54%/38%||1 | + | |a wanderer's pack||Caravan || 13 ||54%/38%||1 |
|- | |- | ||
|a canvas pack||16||38%/31%||1 | |a canvas pack||16||38%/31%||1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |a fashionable knights pack||16||50%||1 | + | |a fashionable knights pack||Knights Guild ||16||50%||1 |
|- | |- | ||
|a soft sack||18||44%/28%||1 | |a soft sack||18||44%/28%||1 | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|a provision sack||20||35%||1 | |a provision sack||20||35%||1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |a large silk pack ||20||33%/30%||1 | + | |a large silk pack ||Charky ||20||33%/30%||1 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |an equipment rucksack||20||33%/30%||1 | + | |an equipment rucksack||Felgands ||20||33%/30%||1 |
|- | |- | ||
− | |a rugged knapsack||22||64%/32%||1 | + | |a rugged knapsack||Geo ||22||64%/32%||1 |
|- | |- | ||
|the belt of the giant||30||66%||2 | |the belt of the giant||30||66%||2 |
Revision as of 13:21, 8 May 2014
Containers are important for any character. They make it so you can carry much more than you normally would be able to without them. For best results, use worn containers.
Weight reduction = % by which the container reduces when full. i.e. hobbit-made backpack makes 6 bottles weigh 4, so thats a 33% reduction
Some containers have better bonuses when worn, so its organized under weight reduction like so: worn/not worn. If only one value shown then there is no difference.
Worn Listings
Name | From | Capacity | Weight Reduction | Empty Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
a hobbit-made backpack | Hobbitat | 6 | 33% | 2 |
a bag | 6 | 33% | 1 | |
a fine fur pouch(ranger) | Rangers | 6 | 66%/50% | 1 |
a fine fur pack(ranger) | Rangers | 9 | 33% | 1 |
a large leather sack | 10 | 40% | 1 | |
a leather backpack | 10 | 50% | 1 | |
a fine fur sack(ranger) | Rangers | 11 | 55% | 1 |
a wanderer's pack | Caravan | 13 | 54%/38% | 1 |
a canvas pack | 16 | 38%/31% | 1 | |
a fashionable knights pack | Knights Guild | 16 | 50% | 1 |
a soft sack | 18 | 44%/28% | 1 | |
a provision sack | 20 | 35% | 1 | |
a large silk pack | Charky | 20 | 33%/30% | 1 |
an equipment rucksack | Felgands | 20 | 33%/30% | 1 |
a rugged knapsack | Geo | 22 | 64%/32% | 1 |
the belt of the giant | 30 | 66% | 2 |
Not Worn Listings
Name | Capacity | Weight Reduction | Empty Weight |
---|---|---|---|
a footlocker | 15 | 33% | 2 |
a chest* | 40 | 35% | 5 |
Chest from fubs and chest from brigand seem the same
Credit
Information taken from notes gathered by GhanimX, notes found on proboards, and some stuff from cosms site.